Industry Knowledge Is Retiring
It's a Wednesday afternoon at a BOMA local luncheon. The room is full of the people who built this industry - engineers with years of mechanical knowledge, property managers who've navigated recessions, market collapses, and a global pandemic, and vendors that have worked with a dozen property managers at the same building over the years. They are sharp, experienced, and generous with their time.
And in ten years, most of them will be gone.
That's not a prediction. It's the math.
The Retirement Cliff
Roughly 40% of the commercial real estate workforce will reach retirement age within the next decade. That number has been cited in reports and mentioned in conference keynotes, then promptly set aside while everyone returns to their inbox.
It should not be set aside.
This industry runs on earned knowledge - the kind that doesn't live in a software platform or a training manual. It lives in the professional who knows why that generator was oversized at installation, who remembers what went wrong during the 2011 water main incident and how ownership responded, who can read a tenant's tone in a work order and know the lease renewal is at risk before anyone else in the room senses it.
That knowledge does not transfer automatically. It transfers deliberately - through time, relationship, and intentional instruction.
And right now, the industry is not being deliberate enough.
There Are More Mentees Than Mentors
The pipeline of people who need development is growing faster than the pipeline of people positioned and willing to do the developing.
Emerging professionals are entering the industry in volume. BOMA's Emerging Professionals programs, the Michel Coleman Scholarship, leadership academies - these initiatives exist because the industry recognizes the gap and is actively trying to close it. They create access, accelerate career development, and put rising talent in rooms with experienced leaders who would otherwise could take years to reach.
But structured programs alone cannot carry the weight.
A scholarship creates access. A leadership academy builds competence. The mentorship relationship - the one-on-one, ongoing transfer of professional judgment has to happen at the organizational level. And most organizations are underinvesting in it.
The result is a generation of emerging professionals who are motivated, credentialed, and fundamentally under-mentored. They know what the job looks like. They don't always know how a 25-year veteran thinks when the situation goes sideways.
The Knowledge That Can't Be Googled
There are things you learn in a classroom and things you learn at 4:45 PM when your fire panel activates and your engineer has already went home for the day.
These are not the same category of knowledge.
The operational judgment this industry depends on - when to push a vendor and when to pull back, how to read a capital budget conversation with ownership, how to manage a chief engineer who knows more than you but reports to you - none of that is in a textbook. It was passed down. Somebody showed somebody. That's how it has always worked.
The problem is that the people doing the showing are walking toward the exit. And they are not always being asked to hand anything off before they leave.
When a 30-year chief engineer retires without documenting a single sequence of operations, that knowledge is gone. When a senior property manager who has managed multiple full lease cycles leaves without ever formally mentoring a successor, that judgment evaporates. Organizations absorb the cost quietly - usually in the form of avoidable mistakes made by capable people who simply weren't shown what they needed to know.
The Industry's Structural Problem
Mentorship in commercial real estate is treated as a personal virtue, not a professional obligation. It happens when individuals choose to invest their time - not when organizations build systems that require it.
That framing needs to change.
The most effective leaders this industry has produced didn't just manage buildings well. They developed people who went on to manage buildings well. The legacy isn't the portfolio. The legacy is the professionals they shaped.
This is what industry organizations like BOMA are trying to codify. The Emerging Professionals groups, the scholarship programs, the leadership development tracks - these are the industry's attempt to build a formal transfer mechanism for what has historically happened informally. Sitting across the table from another professional once a month and sharing what you've actually learned is transformational.
What This Requires From Both Sides
For experienced leaders: The window to transfer your knowledge is not infinite. Every year you stay in the industry without deliberately developing someone is a year of accumulated judgment that may not make it to the next generation. You do not need a formal program, a title, or a structured curriculum. You need to be willing to let someone sit with you, ask questions, and learn how you think.
For emerging professionals: The programs exist to get you in the room. What you do in the room is on you. The leaders who built careers worth studying didn't wait to be developed - they sought out the people who knew more than them and made it easy to be mentored. Ask better questions. Show up prepared. Take notes you'll actually use. Make the experienced leaders glad they gave you the time.
The Compounding Cost of Waiting
The retirement cliff does not wait for the industry to get organized. The knowledge drain is already underway. Buildings are being run today by teams where the most experienced person in the room has seven years of experience instead of twenty.
That's not a failure of individual professionals. It's a structural gap that will continue to widen until the industry treats mentorship as infrastructure - not a bonus.
BOMA's programming, the scholarship initiatives, the leadership academies - these are the scaffolding. The actual construction happens when experienced leaders decide their job isn't finished when they manage a building well.
It's finished when they've ensured the person behind them can manage it better.
If you found this newsletter interesting, consider checking out these past editions:
